Papers with weaker models

5 papers
Removing RLHF Protections in GPT-4 via Fine-Tuning (2024.naacl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have increased in their capabilities, which increases their potential for dual use.
Approach: They show that fine-tuning can remove RLHFprotections with as few as 340 examples and a 95% success rate.
Outcome: The proposed method removes RLHFprotections with as few as 340 examples and a 95% success rate on non-censored outputs.
How Much Does Attention Actually Attend? Questioning the Importance of Attention in Pretrained Transformers (2022.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Pretrained language models use the attention mechanism to contextualize input inputs . but, we find that it is not as important as thought for pretrained models .
Approach: They propose a probing method that replaces input-dependent attention matrices with constant ones.
Outcome: The proposed method improves performance of pretrained language models without input-dependent attention.
RotBench: Evaluating Multi-modal Large Language Models on Identifying Image Rotation (2026.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can identify the orientation of input images rotated 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°.
Approach: They propose a manually-filtered benchmark to evaluate MLLMs' ability to accurately identify rotation in input images.
Outcome: The proposed model improves on the 'rotational cues' of 360° and 180° images, but not 90° and 270° rotations.
Reasoning as Gradient: Scaling MLE Agents Beyond Tree Search (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: LLM-based agents for machine learning engineering rely on tree search to rank candidates.
Approach: They propose an LLM-based agent that operationalizes gradient-based optimization.
Outcome: The proposed agent achieves a state-of-the-art 35.1% any-medal rate on MLE-Bench with a limited budget on a single GPU.
ECON: On the Detection and Resolution of Evidence Conflicts (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have shown that AI generated content is more likely to dominate search results, making it difficult to detect when compared to human-produced content.
Approach: They propose a method for generating diverse, validated evidence conflicts to simulate real-world misinformation scenarios.
Outcome: The proposed method enables the detection of conflicting information in real-world scenarios and shows that weaker models struggle with similar answer conflicts while stronger models show robust performance.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations